Thanks Shane,
It's a good question about the "health" of owner building. If it's in decline it is obviously not due to a lack of demand, but is due to the efforts of big builders and organisations like the Victorian Building Commission which set out to crush owner building some years ago.
In Victoria they made it more difficult to register as an owner builder, then they made it compulsory to insure your home to any prospective purchaser for 6.5 years... which is ridiculous.
First you had to get a detailed inspection done for any prospective purchaser... which I haven't got a problem with. I think all builders and vendors should have to do that. At present with secondhand houses it's "buyer beware" and individual prospective purchasers have to pay to get their own inspections done.
Then they make you take out insurance... which only covers anything NOT mentioned in the detailed building report at the time of sale! ie. The insurance doesn't cover ANYTHING really. I'd be very surprised if there had EVER been a single payout under this forced owner builder insurance. It's a massive insurance industry and government (GST etc) ripoff. But it goes on unquestioned.
It's the same with general building insurance. You can't claim unless the builder is dead or has fled the country. Anything else you have to chase the builder to fix... and I've heard LOTS of horror stories from people left homeless and broke as a result.
Queensland has a government-run scheme which takes about one percent of the cost of each house as compulsory insurance, and deals with and fixes claims centrally... which is a sensible scheme. But in Victoria and elsewhere the insurance ripoff continues (see article below from December 2010).
All owner-built homes have always had to have building permits and inspections and approvals at every stage, and occupancy certificates... just like "professional" builders... so consumers have always been protected. And because most if not all owner builders are building their own homes... I would argue that they often do a better, more conscientious job, than the "pro's".
There was no evidence of a problem with owner building, and from all accounts consumer complaints were virtually non-existent... which you can't say about the mainstream building industry.
But they cracked down on it anyway... because it was becoming too popular... and big builders felt they were missing out on some $$$$ action.
In fact most owner builders, like us, employ professional builders and building industry tradesmen to do just about every stage of their project... so the money we put into the economy is huge.
When I built my muddie 12 years ago the average house price in Melbourne was $190,000. Now it's $600,000!
So everyone's screaming blue murder about "housing affordability... yet no-one's doing anything about it.
The cost of building hasn't increased much over that time. My Dad's a builder, and he knows guys in the industry still getting paid $30 an hour... who were getting that much 30 years ago!
Young builders have to put their own family home up as collateral to get "building insurance" so they can start working in the industry. If they stuff up they lose their family home. The "insurance" company risks nothing. It's outrageous.
The cost of land has gone up... but mainly in the city. It's obscene in a country as big as this that there's a "shortage" of housing land. It's completely manufactured to make sure everyone has a $500,000 mortgage and that these days both husbands and wives basically work for the banks and government till about Friday lunchtime every week.
I had a Swiss woman on my Melbourne bike tour this week who's a radio journalist and takes a one hour train ride to work every day. I asked her how far that was? She said 200km on the other side of the Swiss alps! In Melbourne you'd be lucky to get from the city to my house in Heidelberg in an hour. That's 10km!
If a little country like Switzerland with 7.8 million people can build trains like that... why can't we with 22 million?
If you ran a single fast train to Geelong, or Ballarat or Bendigo or Echuca you would open up so much land that everyone could afford a cheap house. Surely that would be worthwhile. You could build the cost of the train into the land sales and still provide cheap housing.
But don't hold your breath.
Cheers,
Murray
PS Owner builders should get in on this class action... because, as I've mentioned above... we've been forced to pay for worthless insurance ripoffs for a decade too. It's millions of dollars.
Let's watch this one. Owner builders should march on Parliament and show a bit of solidarity with other parts of the industry that are getting organised to fight. OBs tend to be individualistic, and pretty low-rent, and low-conflict... but this is a chance to make our voices heard by just tagging along.
We owe it to others like us, who otherwise might not get a chance to enjoy the owner builder experience in future... and to exercise their basic human right to house their families affordably.
I've been writing about this issue for nearly a decade. See
http://www.byohouse.com.au/dodgy.htmMaybe something's finally going to be done.
I'll attach an article from
http://www.builderscollective.org.au/ on the dodgy insurance issue:
Government and insurers face class action over dodgy warranty schemeEXCLUSIVE: HUNDREDS of small family owned Australian builders are facing extinction because of Builders Warranty Insurance, according to a survey of over 1000 builders by PropertyReview.com.au conducted over the past month.
Builders in both Victoria and NSW are facing the increasing dilemma of not being able to get warranty insurance because thousands don’t meet new exacting insurance companies criteria. Insurance companies take none of the risk on warranty insurance and in fact are ‘illegally’ making builders sign indemnities where they personally face the total risk of the worthless insurance.
Leading lawyers tell PropertyReview.com.au that the home warranty insurance in NSW and Victoria is potentially illegal. According to section 12 of the Insurance Act 1973 a reinsurer must be licensed under the Act otherwise they commit an offence. No builder in Australia is a registered insurance company despite facing 100% of the risk of home warranty insurance.
One leading barrister who did not want to be named told PropertyReview.com.au: “It’s a rort. Governments know it’s at best worthless and at worst illegal, but they do nothing. They seem willing to watch hundreds of small family businesses go out of business.â€
She indicated that a class action if successful could be one of the largest payouts in Australian history.
“The losses by builders who have been forced by State governments to sign up as illegal insurers over almost a decade is immense.â€
PropertyReview.com.au has exclusively learned that a class action is now brewing against insurance companies, the Victorian and NSW governments with hundreds of builders having signed up for the class action in the past three weeks. Senior barristers and a leading class action law firm have been working on the case secretly for the past six months.
It is expected an application and statement of claim will be filed in the Federal Court early in the New Year with respondents being the NSW and Victorian governments as well as a number of insurance companies. Already more than 250 builders have signed up to the action, many donating thousands of dollars to the cause. Many more are expected to sign before the action is filed.
The majority of the builders are in Victoria and New South Wales where the regime of worthless home warranty insurance rules.
Both consumer advocates and building representatives say that home warranty insurance ruled over by successive Labor governments have forced builders to the wall.
“The only people making money out of the home warranty insurance scheme described by Choice as ‘junk insurance’ are insurance companies, their brokers, and state governments,†one former senior HIA member told PropertyReview.com.au. He did not want to be named due to potential reprisals from insurance companies.
A builder has to die, disappear or become insolvent for a consumer to collect on home warranty insurance.
The NSW Labor government has refused to budge on their worthless home warranty insurance scheme despite the years of complaints from both builders and consumers. The NSW Opposition has pledged to rid NSW of warranty insurance in line with either the Queensland or Tasmanian schemes.
The potential class action poses a real dilemma for the newly elected Baillieu Victorian government, which in its years of Opposition, declared it would rid Victoria of home warranty insurance.
Premier Ted Baillieu, his deputy Peter Ryan have both stated publicly in the past that they would do away with warranty insurance.
However, early representations to senior Victorian government minister Matthew Guy have fallen on deaf ears. Mr. Guy or his advisors have not returned any calls on the matter.
Rumours are rife insurance companies assisted in the funding of the Victorian Coalition at the recent State election to shore up their campaign to ensure the lucrative warranties continue to flood the insurance companies coffers.
Hundreds, possibly thousands, of Victorian builders and their families intend marching on Parliament early in 2011.
Nelson Yap, Editor.
PropertyReview.com.au